City of Albert Lea

Community Development Plan

2005 to 2010

 

Executive Summary

 

The Southwest Minnesota Housing Partnership in collaboration with Partners in Housing, Inc., the City of Albert Lea, and the Albert Lea Housing and Redevelopment Authority have developed the Albert Lea Community Development Plan to identify a strategy for the implementation of community needs.  The foundation of this plan is the Housing Market Analysis and Demand Estimates for Freeborn County completed in January 2006 by the research firm Maxfield Research, Inc.  The goal of the Community Development Plan is to identify existing trends and needs as described in the housing study and subsequent research; and to outline priorities and strategies for the community to implement for improved housing and other related community needs.

 

The City has a strong history of local planning efforts including a 2002 Housing Study by Partners in Housing, Inc., Minnesota Design Team visit (October 7-9, 2004), and Albert Lea Listens.  Albert Lea Listens is a strategic planning process completed in 2004.

 

A community meeting was held on March 15, 2006 to discuss local housing needs, barriers, and resources available with local community representatives.  A list of those participating through the community meeting and overall planning process can be found at the end of this document. 

 

The City of Albert Lea and the Albert Lea Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) are the primary public entities responsible for housing in the City of Albert Lea.  This Community Development Plan creates a framework for the community to accomplish locally developed goals.  While the implementation of these goals will primarily be the responsibility of the City and its HRA, working with nonprofit organizations, consultants, builders, developers, employers, and others will be critical to the overall implementation. 

 

Community involvement to implement recommendations found in this plan can occur at varying degrees.  The first is at the policy level in which communities can make changes to local policies and plans to support a balanced housing development.  The second is at an intermediate level where communities can provide letters of support, and financial or technical assistance.  The final level would be an advanced level where a community may not only finance a project but assume an ownership role as well.  The following outlines activities along all three levels where the community could become involved.  Often the degree at which communities become involved in projects depends on local growth, involvement of the private market, as well as the profile of persons needing housing.  For instance, a community with lower household incomes will need to produce the most affordable housing possible which may include utilizing multiple resources such as land contributions, tax increment financing, down payment assistance funds, etc.      


 

To achieve the goals that are outlined in this plan, an investment of local public and private funds as well as major investments of state, federal, and other charitable funds will be required.  The following table outlines the overall production goals for the community as well as total investment. 

 

Table 1

Housing Production Goals:  2006-2010

FOR-SALE HOUSING

Housing Study/Plan Demand

2005 to 2015

Action Plan Proposed Units

2006 to 2010

Estimated Value Per Unit

Total Development Value

Single Family Entry Level Homes

50 to 55

50 to 55

$140,000 - $175,000

$7,000,000 - $9,625,000

Single Family Move-up and Executive Homes

200 to 215

100 to 125

$175,000+

$17,500,000+

Condominium/Townhome Entry Level Homes

40 to 45

20 to 25

$150,000 - $200,000

$3,000,000 - $5,000,000

Condominium/Townhome Upper End Homes

55 to 65

25 to 35

$200,000+

$5,000,000+

Total For-Sale Housing

345 to 380

195 to 240

 

$32,500,000+

REHABILITATION

 

 

 

 

Trailside Apartments and Townhomes (formerly Channel View)

110

110

$70,909

$7,800,000

Owner Occupied Rehab

40 to 60

20 to 30

$20,000

$400,000 - $600,000

Rental Rehabilitation

30 to 100

15 to 30

$15,000

$225,000 - $450,000

Commercial Rehabilitation

10 to 20

0

$0

$0

Purchase plus Rehab

5 to 10

2 to 5

$80,000

$160,000 - $400,000

MURL

3 to 6

2 to 3

$70,000

$140,000 - $210,000

Redevelopment (infill demolition and new construction)

3 to 6

2 to 3

$140,000 - $160,000

$280,000 - $480,000

Total Rehabilitation

188 to 286

 

 

$9,005,000+

RENTAL HOUSING

 

 

 

 

General Occupancy Affordable (LIHTC) Units – Pickerel Park #2

24

24

N/A

N/A


 

General Occupancy Affordable/Subsidized Units

20 to 35

20 to 35

$105,000 - $120,000

(tax exempt financing)

$120,000-$140,000

(tax credit financing)

$2,100,000 - $4,900,000

General Occupancy Market Rate Units

55 to 75

25 to 40

$120,000 - $135,000

$3,000,000-$5,400,000

Senior Adult/Few Services Market Rate Units

55 to 65

55 to 65

$85,000-$100,000

$4,675,000-$6,500,000

Senior Congregate Market Rate Units

25 to 30

0

$0

$0

Senior Assisted Living Market Rate Units

15 to 20

0

$0

$0

Senior Memory Care Market Rate Units

10 to 15

10 to 15

$120,000-$140,000

$1,200,000-$2,100,000

Total Rental Housing

204 to 264

 

 

$10,975,000+

TOTAL ALL HOUSING

 

 

 

$52,480,000+

Note:  These figures are approximate costs with actual development costs varying depending on amenities provided, size of the units, site conditions, and design of projects.

 

Housing is an extremely important component in the overall function of the community.  The community’s housing stock instills a significant impact on the physical character of the City of Albert Lea.  Adequate housing, as a basic element, is critical to current and future citizens.  The availability of dwellings and a variety of housing types and options is essential to continued community stability and growth.  Factors such as the age of housing stock and the age of the population are only a couple of factors that determine need.  Possible constraints on land and the cost of development will determine where development occurs. 


 

Based on the research conducted through the housing study and these efforts, the following development concepts are recommended:

 

2005 to 2015

  • 55 to 75 units of general occupancy market rate rental units

o       20% to 25% one bedroom units at $500 to $550

o       60% to 65% two bedroom units at $650 to $700

o       10% to 20% two bedroom plus den units at $725 to $775

  • 20 to 35 units of general occupancy affordable/subsidized rental units targeted to low and very low income households

o       33% to 50% one bedroom units based on 30% of income

o       50% to 66% two bedroom units based on 30% of income

  • 55 to 65 units of senior adult/few-services market rate rental units

o       25% to 30% one bedroom units at $675 to $700

o       25% to 30% one bedroom plus den units at $775 to $800

o       40% to 50% two bedroom units at $825 to $875

  • 25 to 30 units of senior congregate market rate rental units

o       one bedroom units starting at $1,150

o       two bedroom units starting at $1,300

  • 15 to 20 units of senior assisted living market rate rental units
     

  • 10 to 15 units of senior memory care market rate rental units

o       10 to 15 efficiency units with base fees at $3,300

  • 50 to 55 entry level single family owner occupied units between $150,000 and $175,000 
     

  • 85 to 95 move-up single family owner occupied units between $175,000 and $270,000 
     

  • 115 to 120 executive single family owner occupied units over $270,000 
     

  • 40 to 45 entry level condominium/townhome owner occupied units between $150,000 and $200,000
     

  • 55 to 65 upper end condominium/townhome owner occupied units over $200,000
     

  • 10 to 20 units of commercial rehabilitation

  • 30 to 100 units of rental rehabilitation.

o       20 to 30 units through the Small Cities Development Program

o       10 to 70 units through HOME Rental Rehabilitation, Rental Rehab Loan Program and private investment

  • 40 to 60 units of owner occupied rehabilitation through the Small Cities Development Program
     

  • 5 to 10 units through a purchase/rehabilitation program
     

  • 3 to 6 units through the Minnesota Urban and Rural Homesteading Program (MURL)
     

  • 3 to 6 units of infill redevelopment
     

  • 4 to 8 units of permanent supportive housing through existing units utilizing Shelter plus Care or other options. 
     

  • Continue to implement CASA in older targeted neighborhoods as well as towards any new entry level developments
     

  • Preservation and rehabilitation of 110 units at Trailside Apartments and Townhomes (formerly Channel View)
     

  •  Development of 24 tax credit units at Pickerel Park #2 

It is important to note that the recommendations found within this Community Development Plan as well as the Housing Study are based on housing conditions and research conducted at the time of the study and does not take into account any external changes that would potentially change the outcome of the study.  This would include such items as industry layoffs, governmental restrictions, zoning, etc.  Data is collected at a point in time and therefore changes beyond this date are not reflected in the analysis.